Rick Scarborough’s message to NE Tarrant Tea Party

Posted July 14th, 2011 by Julie

Judging by the feedback from those who attended, Rick Scarborough was one of the best speakers we’ve ever had at NE Tarrant Tea Party.  His message implored us to keep working to get the church involved in the fight to save America.  He cited example after example of pastors throughout American history who turned in their church robes for a military uniform to fight for America.  And then he quoted the following:

If there is a decay of conscience, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the public press lacks moral discernment, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the church is degenerate and worldly, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the world loses its interest in Christianity, the pulpit is responsible for it. If Satan rules in our halls of legislation, the pulpit is responsible for it. If our politics become so corrupt that the very foundations of our government are ready to fall away, the pulpit is responsible for it. ~ Rev. Charles Finney

Here’s a summary one of our members provided.  The link he provides is to a nine-minute video produced by CNN telling all about the work Rick Scarborough does.  It is very, very good.

Scarborough is the author of the acclaimed book Enough is Enough and founder of Vision America an organization formed to mobilize Christians to restore Judeo-Christian values in America. He emphatically emphasized relying on our core values to search for, identify and support candidates who will represent us as true conservatives. Watch this video to learn why he says, “This is not the time to quit–it’s the time to re-up.”  http://www.visionamerica.us/

Watch the nine-minute CNN video linked to above if you can.  Even better, watch the full presentation from Dr. Rick Scarborough at the following links.  It will not be a waste of your time!

Categories:  Disturbing Trends | Videos

July 11: NETTP presents Rick Scarborough

Posted July 7th, 2011 by Julie

NE Tarrant Tea Party meeting

with

Guest Speaker:  Dr. Rick Scarborough of Vision America

and

an Interview with US Senate Candidate Glenn Addison

July 11, 2011, 6:30-8:00pm

$5 chicken finger dinner served at 6pm

1060 E Highland, Southlake 76092

(bldg 1020 of Highland Meadow Montessori Academy)

Dr. Rick Scarborough, D Min.
Founder and President of Vision America

Rick Scarborough holds a Master of Divinity Degree from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary and a Doctor of Ministry Degree from Louisiana Baptist Theological Seminary. He holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree from Houston Baptist University, with a double major in Political Science and Speech.

Dr. Scarborough and Tommye, his wife, have two grown children, Misty and Richard, and one daughter in Heaven, Kathryn who finished her assignment here in 2004 at 25 years of age. Misty is married to Daniel Allmond; they have two children, Micah and Alexis.  Richard is married to Anny; they have twins, Richard Wayne III and Kaylee Anne.

From 1990 to June 2002, Dr. Scarborough was the Senior Pastor of First Baptist Church of Pearland located on the southeast side of the Houston Metroplex. During his twelve year ministry there, the church baptized over 2,000 people and relocated to a beautiful new 27-acre campus and facilities in March 2001; featuring Eagle Heights Christian Academy with faculty and student population of over 300 and Trinity Oaks Retirement Center with housing for 85 independent and assisted living units.

In 1992, Pastor Dr. Scarborough gained national recognition when he exposed the contents of a disturbing assembly program at the local high school. Under the auspices of an “AIDS Presentation,” a young lady, sponsored by the AIDS Foundation of Houston, candidly discussed every sex act imaginable expressing the opinion (presented as fact) that “safe sex” was attainable by using condoms. Dr. Scarborough recorded the assembly and then made transcripts available to his congregation the following Sunday morning. The resulting furor that erupted caught the eye of the national media.

Dr. Scarborough mobilized his congregation during the following months to make significant changes in Pearland. Members began running for public office, as well as volunteering for various organizations beyond traditional “Christian ministry” seeking to become “salt and light” in their community. National Public Radio produced a two-part feature on Dr. Scarborough during which he was dubbed, “The Rising Star of the Religious Right”.

In 1996 he published the widely acclaimed 252-page book appropriately entitled, Enough is Enough; a Call to Christian Involvement. Other published works include, In Defense of Mixing Church and State and It All Depends on What Is…Is. In 2007 he published Liberalism Kills Kids.

In 1998, he founded Vision America, an organization whose mission is to “inform and mobilize Pastors and their congregations to become salt and light, becoming pro-active in restoring Judeo-Christian values in America.” The advisory board of Vision America includes notable Christian leaders such as Don Wildmon and Dr. Tim LaHaye.

On May 9, 2005, the Washington Post carried a front page story in the Sunday addition on the effective work that Dr. Scarborough and the Judeo-Christian Council is accomplishing in their efforts to confront Judicial tyranny and mobilize pastors.

Dr. Scarborough’s work has been featured in numerous articles and publications around the nation. A partial listing includes the New York Times, Washington Post, Kansas City Star, Dallas Morning News, Houston Chronicle, Boston Globe and the Congressional Quarterly.

Dr. Scarborough has appeared on Larry King Live, Fox News, CBS Evening News and numerous other television and radio programs.  The work of Vision America has been featured in several documentaries and specials such as CNN’s award winning special God’s Warriors and the HBO documentary, Friends of God.

Dr. Scarborough and Vision America have been featured on Focus on the Family with Dr. James Dobson three times.

Dr. Scarborough regularly speaks in churches, rallies, and political conventions.

Liberal or Conservative? Find out!

Posted June 30th, 2011 by Julie

Are you a liberal or a conservative?  I asked NE Tarrant Tea Party member Tom Moore to create a chart outlining the fundamental differences between the two.  My hope was that it would be something very clear I could point to when conversing with liberal friends.  I always try to give them the benefit of the doubt, thinking that if they only knew what all is included in the belief system they were clinging to, they’d change their minds.  Here’s what Tom put together.  I think he nailed it!  So which one are you…?

Categories:  Disturbing Trends | Sound Off

Sept 12: Allen Clark on Civilizational Jihad

Posted May 26th, 2011 by Julie

NE Tarrant Tea Party meeting

Guest Speaker:  Allen Clark on Civilizational Jihad

September 12, 2011, 6:30-7:00pm

$5 dinner served at 6pm

1060 E Highland, Southlake 76092

(bldg 1020 of Highland Meadow Montessori Academy)

Allen Clark will speak to us on “Civilizational Jihad”…  internal subversion and treason, broader than Sharia Law.

About Allen Clark…

After attending Phillips Exeter Academy, Allen graduated the United States Military Academy in 1963, after which he was commissioned in the Army Corps of Engineers.  Two years after graduation from West Point, he volunteered for a tour in Vietnam where he served as a Military Intelligence officer assigned to the Fifth Special Forces Group.  Allen sustained injuries in an early-morning mortar attack at the Dak To Special Forces camp on June 17, 1967, that necessitated the amputation of both legs below his knees.  His military service and sacrifice were recognized with receipt of a Silver Star for Gallantry in Action, the Purple Heart, and the Combat Infantryman’s Badge. He was airborne-qualified.

While learning to adjust to his disability and to walk on prosthetic legs, he obtained an MBA in finance and investments from Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas.  Allen’s first post-graduate position was as an investment manager for Ross Perot.  His other private sector experience has spanned oil and gas exploration, real estate marketing, and mortgage lending.  He has been vice president of a bank, president of three oil service companies, and co-founder of a real estate investment company in Texas.

Allen’s impassioned commitment to public service and to helping veterans began with an appointment in 1979 as the Special Assistant for Administration to Texas Governor William P. Clements, Jr.  In 1981, Allen was President Ronald Reagan’s selection to be Deputy Administrator for the Veterans Administration (now the Department of Veterans Affairs).  However, he chose to remain in Texas where in 1982 he received the Texas Republican Party’s nomination to run for State Treasurer in a race that was won by former Texas State Governor Ann Richards.

In 1989, he was nominated by President George H.W. Bush and confirmed by the U.S. Senate as Assistant Secretary for Veterans Liaison and Program Coordination at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.  In 1991, he received his second VA confirmation as Director of the National Cemetery System, a position in which he served until the end of the Bush Administration.

Allen’s dedicated efforts to support veterans’ causes at the national and state levels were recognized with his nomination by the Disabled American Veterans (DAV) organization as the Texas State candidate for the national Outstanding Disabled Veteran of the year 2000.  In 1993 the Military Chaplains Association awarded him their annual National Citizenship Award.”

He retired in 2005 as the Public Affairs Officer for the VA North Texas Health Care System in Dallas, Texas.  His current lay ministry is involved in outreach efforts to help veterans recover emotionally and spiritually from adverse wartime experiences.  Allen participates in many community and civic activities, including regularly speaking at various group events and churches.  Allen has addressed many audiences nationwide as a political candidate, public official, and motivational speaker.  Allen’s autobiography titled “Wounded Soldier, Healing Warrior” was published in early 2007 by Zenith Press (visit book site).

He is a member of the American Legion, Association of the U.S. Army, Disabled American Veterans, Military Order of the World Wars, Military Order of the Purple Heart, Military Officers Association, Sons of the American Revolution, Special Forces Association, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Association of Graduates of the U.S. Military Academy, and Vietnam Veterans of America.

Allen and his wife, the former Linda Frost, are members of Christ Church, Plano, TX.  Allen can be contacted by sending an email to allenbclark@aol.com.
Here is some reading that will be recommended in this presentation:

Good Answer from Keith Houser, CISD Candidate

Posted March 23rd, 2011 by Julie

The NE Tarrant Tea Party has submitted a questionnaire to all municipal and school board candidates in our area of coverage.  One response we got back today should please most conservatives…

Question:

What are your thoughts on the recent controversy over Mansfield ISD requiring 100 minutes of Arabic culture studies per week? Should American sovereignty, constitutional government or private enterprise be included in classroom curriculum?

Response from Keith Houser, candidate for Carroll ISD:

Keith Houser, candidate for CISD Board

Today’s students know little about American sovereignty, the US and Texas constitutions and private enterprise. I would support 100 minutes per SEMESTER (not per week) on Arabic culture, so long as it is balanced and tells the truth. That truth would include how many women annually are stoned to death for adultery, how many women are “honor killed” by family members, how many women are sexually mutilated by their husbands, how many Christians and Jews are killed as “infidels” and how many people die each month from peaceful homicide bombers, ethnic cleanings and Islamic tribal disputes worldwide.

As a 501(c)3 organization, NE Tarrant Tea Party does not endorse any candidate, but we do ask questions that will help our members make up their own minds about a candidate.  And this is one answer we think our members will appreciate!

The complete packet of questions and responses will be made available to our members via email, will be posted on this website, and will be available via email to anyone who requests it.  Candidates have until April 8 to submit their answers.  Our candidate fair is April 11 from 6-6:45 at 1060 E Highland Meadow, Southlake, followed by our guest speaker, Michael Badnarik, who will speak on the Federal Reserve and fiat money.  We’ll also be hearing from Lela Pittenger briefly on her candidacy for US Senate.

What is Agenda 21?

Posted March 16th, 2011 by Julie

From American Thinker, October 2009:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/un_agenda_21_coming_to_a_neigh.html

Most Americans are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program known as Agenda 21. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development created Agenda 21 as a sustainability agenda which is arguably an amalgamation of socialism and extreme environmentalism brushed with anti-American, anti-capitalist overtones.

A detailed history on sustainable development, definitions, and critical actions can be found here. Section III of the Agenda 21 Plan addresses local community sustainable development.  The Preamble and Chapter 28 discuss how Agenda 21 should be implemented at a local level. The United Nations purposely recommends avoiding the term Agenda 21 and suggests a cleverly named alternative: “smart growth.” The United Nations Millennium Papers – Issue 2 (page 5) says this of Agenda 21 and smart growth:
Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth [emphasis added].
Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn’t care less whether it’s called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department. The plan, if enacted, proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights:
  • Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks
  • Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers
  • Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums
  • Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities
  • Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods
Carroll County, Maryland is one of 1,168 cities, towns, and counties worldwide that are members of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) – Local Governments for Sustainability, which is an international association of local governments as well as national and regional local government organizations that have made a commitment to sustainable development. The ICLEI mission statement closely resembles that of Agenda 21. In fact, the ICLEI has Special Consultative Status with the UN Economic and Social Council and coordinates local government representation in the UN processes related to Agenda 21.
Community leaders working together in Carroll County recently defended their county against overreaching smart growth initiatives. Richard Rothschild, a candidate for Commissioner, emphatically remarks, “Smart growth is not science; it is political dogma combined with an insidious dose of social engineering. Smart growth is a wedding wherein zoning code is married with government-sponsored housing initiatives to accomplish government’s goal of social re-engineering. It urbanizes rural towns with high-density development, and gerrymanders population centers through the use of housing initiatives that enable people with weak patterns of personal financial responsibility to acquire homes in higher-income areas. This has the effect of shifting the voting patterns of rural municipalities from Right to Left.”
Smart growth plans usurp property rights and constitutional rights. Local officials, at the behest of State Government, revise zoning laws to fit into a “smart code” zoning template. A massive reshuffling of property rights ensues. Farmers may lose subdivision rights; conservation land adjacent to population centers may be rezoned into commercial employment centers; and low-density land in small towns is re-designated as growth area and rezoned to accommodate diverse housing including high-density apartments and condominiums.
Finally, a healthy dose of federal- or state-sponsored housing initiatives is embraced to ensure communities are properly balanced. The net effect of these plans is to create highly urbanized population centers throughout otherwise-rural counties, while simultaneously limiting the availability of land for suburban and estate subdivisions, as these are considered an unsustainable waste of land by Agenda 21 disciples.
Clearly, smart growth plans will impact Americans’ future choices in where and how they live. Furthermore, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal and state agencies may attempt to deny grant funds to states and cities that do not adopt smart growth plans.
Most Americans will remain unaware of the implications of smart growth and Agenda 21 until after it is promulgated in their own backyards. Ironically, these plans are more insidious than the Eminent Domain ruling by the Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v City of New London. Under Eminent Domain rulings, property owners usually receive compensation for their losses.
Conversely, smart growth municipal plans, required by statute, enable municipalities to change zoning laws and engage in other regulatory actions that devalue property, restrict off-conveyances, and otherwise erode property values without payment of any compensation to the property owner.
Smart growth has another interesting unintended consequence: it can disrupt conventional alliances and lead to strange political bedfellows. Rural urbanization plans may raise the ire of environmental groups while simultaneously stirring the wrath of both conservative and liberal residents that want to maintain the rural fabric of their communities. Conversely, developers, sensing opportunity, may side with government smart growth bureaucrats in support of these plans.
Regardless of political orientation, two indisputable facts remain. Agenda 21 is a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty, and it is coming to a neighborhood near you.

A look at non-teacher salaries for Dallas ISD

Posted March 16th, 2011 by Julie

Dallas ISD has 17,475 employees with a payroll of about $881 million and a budget of $1.25 billion.  The highest paid employee is Eliu Hinojosa, the Superintendent, at $328,237. The district has 10,907 teachers with the highest paid being Joseph Daniels making $87,000, but that’s after 32 years of service! The average pay for a teacher in Dallas ISD is $53k. However, in-between Daniels (the teacher) and Hinojosa  (the Superintendent) are a whopping 273 non-teaching employees.

Here is a partial list of all non-teaching positions:

  • 7 Administrative Chiefs- $1.28 million, that’s an average of $183,650 each.
  • 138 Directors-  $13.8 million, that’s an average of $100k each.
  • 87 Liaisons- $13.2 million at an average of $36K each.
  • 485 Principals, Assistant Principals, Associate Principals- $39 million, an average of $80k each.
  • 106 Coordinators- $7.4 million, an average of $70k each.
  • 99 Managers- $7.8 million, an average of $70k each.
  • 681 Specialist categories 1-4 – $39 million, an average of $57.5k each.
  • 22 Social Workers- $1.3 million, an average of $62.5k each.
  • 128 Therapists, Therapist Assistants- $7.3 million, an average of $57k each.
  • 70 Registrars- $2 million, an average of $29k each.
  • 102 Technicians categories 1-4 – $4.5 million, an average of $44.5k each.
  • 69 Psychologists- $4.3 million, an average of $62.6k each.
  • 113 Special Education Diagnosticians- $7.7 million, an average of $68k each.
  • 18 Interpreters- $664,400, an average of $37k each.
  • 143 Monitors- $2.8 million, an average of $20k each.
  • 209 Nurses- $11.4 million, an average of $54k each.
  • 194 Coaches (not athletics) Dallas Reading Plan, Social Studies, Multi-Language Enrichment- $12 million, an average of $61.6k each.
  • 207 DISD Police and Security Guards- $8.6 million, an average of $41.6k each.

In its proposed 2011-12 budget the Dallas ISD fears a worst-case scenario of a $253 million shortfall. The State of Texas currently provides $463 million to the Dallas ISD, the federal government provides $22 million and local sources make up $766 million for a budget of $1.25 billion.  This budget reflects an increase of 22.7 million from the 2009-10 school year.

Information is from the Texas Tribune and the DISD 2011 budget summary.

Categories:  Disturbing Trends | Economy | Education | Taxes

Budget Cuts – Suggestions Needed!

Posted February 16th, 2011 by Julie

Today I sent the following message to our members:

Rep Phil King is asking for our input.  Did you catch that?  A Representative is actually asking to hear from the people!  Fantastic!  This is our chance to prove that we want to be represented, so be sure to respond to his call.  He wants to hear from us where we’d like to see budget cuts.  Email your ideas to phil.king@house.state.tx.us.  Copy me on it too, and I’ll post them on our website.  That way those who don’t have ideas can read others’ ideas and then support them by sending them to Rep King as well.  Team work!

Below are the responses received so far — actually there’s only one.  Come on, Patriots!  To get your creative juices flowing, check out the comments posted to this article on school finance.  I’ll add your ideas to this list below as they come in.

From B.E., Bedford… The State government is toooo big.  There is no way that the employees of all State agencies, including education, should be receiving more benefits (retirement, health, etc.) than the private sector.
The private sector supports themselves plus the government agencies.  The private sector provides a direct benefit to the economy.  A real product is provided that has a real rather than an ASSUMED demand.
The government agencies provide an indirect benefit(?) to our economy.  It is assumed that the public education system provides what is necessary to advance our society in a meaningful way.  It appears that all that is advancing is the education agency itself.  This includes all the bureaucracies within the State.
The private sector gets benefits based on the market place: supply / demand / competition.  The government agency gets their benefits based on:  IT’S ONLY FAIR.
LIBERALISM IS BASED ON EMOTION.   BEING CONSERVATIVE IS BEING REAL
It is time to STOP kissing up to the liberal agenda.  Make a real move and STOP spending.

One of NETTP’s Core Values: Personal Responsibility

Posted February 12th, 2011 by Julie
The Christian Science Monitor – CSMonitor.com

The deficit Americans should think about most: personal character

Our huge public debt ultimately reflects our lack of individual restraint. But we can do better.


By Lawrence W. Reed
posted February 3, 2011 at 11:52 am EST

Atlanta —From council rooms in small towns to the marble corridors of Capitol Hill, Americans are rightly focusing on ways to halt the tide of red ink.

Facing huge budget shortfalls, states like California and New York are considering radical cuts to balance their books. President Obama acknowledged the seriousness of the problem in his State of the Union message, calling it a “mountain” that could bury us and urging a five-year partial budget freeze. The president is right to admonish us about the magnitude of the problem that he helped mightily to exacerbate. Political leaders who are serious about fiscal discipline deserve some credit for finally acting to correct course.

But even the most aggressive measures to reform federal spending won’t address the underlying cause of our public debt.

That’s because the deficit that matters most is not denominated in dollars at all. Its currency is of the heart and mind. It’s a manifestation of the values with which we circumscribe our actions, our purposes, and our values. I speak of a deficit of character, which arguably is the root of all of our major economic and social troubles today.

Your character is not defined by what you say you believe. It’s defined by the choices you make. History painfully records that when a people allow their personal character to dissipate, they become putty in the hands of tyrants and demagogues. Such tyranny often takes the form of actual rulers, but it can also involve the serfdom of our nobler nature to a lord of lustful impulse. Decadence can destroy democracy as surely as dictatorship.

Among the traits that define strong character are honesty, humility, responsibility, self-discipline, courage, self-reliance, and long-term thinking. A free society is not possible without these traits in widespread practice.

How we subtract from our character

When a person spurns his conscience and fails to do what he knows is right, he subtracts from his character. When he evades his responsibilities, foists his problems and burdens on others, or fails to exert self-discipline; when he allows or encourages wrongdoing on any scale; when he attempts to reform the world without reforming himself first; when he obligates the yet-unborn to pay his current bills for him; when he expects politicians to solve problems that are properly his own business alone; he subtracts from his character – and drags the rest of us down, too.

Mountainous debts, unconscionable deficits, irresponsible bailouts, and reckless spending: These are all economic problems because they sprang first from character problems.

Reform starts with recognition. Not the easy kind that points out flaws in others, but the hard kind that reflects on, then roots out, errors in ourselves.

Is it wrong to take a dollar from the responsible and give it to the irresponsible? Of course it is, which is why so many of us decry the billion-dollar bailouts given to reckless but politically well-connected government agencies and private firms. Yet how many of us accepted taxpayer-funded aid when we fell behind on mortgage payments for homes we never should have bought?

We would express outrage at parents who, after borrowing heavily to buy gadgets and expensive meals, canceled their children’s preschool when the bills came due. So why do we cheer for government “stimulus” that will similarly hurt our children? What is it about doing these things a trillion times over that makes it right?

Once upon a time in America, most citizens expected government to keep the peace and otherwise leave them alone. We built a vibrant, self-reliant, entrepreneurial culture with strong families and solid values.

Somewhere along the way, we lost our moral compass. Like the Roman republic that rose on integrity and collapsed in turpitude, we thought the “bread and circuses” the government could provide us would buy us comfort and security. We have acted as if we really don’t want to be free and responsible citizens, so we get less responsibility from our leaders and less freedom for us.

The good news is that Washington’s profligacy sometimes shocks us into sobriety.

In 1890, American voters raged against the Republican-dominated House of Representatives for its lavish spending. They punished the “Billion Dollar Congress,” cutting the GOP roster in the House by more than 90 seats. A similar backlash occurred this past fall, when Republicans gained 63 seats after Democrats (with some GOP complicity) spent hundreds of billions of dollars we didn’t have.

In both cases, voters seemed mindful of Thomas Jefferson’s warning: “We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude.”

Heeding that exhortation takes more than punishing spendthrift incumbents in Congress once in a while. Our federal government is ultimately a reflection of our self-government, so Americans who are serious about fixing the country’s fiscal mess must begin by fixing their own character.

Resolutions for reform

These resolutions make a good starting point:

•I pledge myself to a lifetime of self-improvement so I can be the model of integrity that friends, family, and acquaintances will want to emulate.

•I resolve to keep my hands in my own pockets, to leave others alone unless they threaten me harm, to take responsibility for my own actions and decisions, and to impose no burdens on others that stem from my own poor judgments.

•I resolve to show the utmost reverence and respect for the lives, property, and rights of my fellow citizens. I will remember that government money is really my neighbors’ money, so I will not vote to loot them. I will stand on my own two feet, behave like an adult in a free and civil society, and expect the same of my children.

•If I need help, I will ask my family, friends, faith network, neighbors, local charities, or even strangers first – and government last.

•If I have a “good idea,” I resolve to elicit support for it through peaceful persuasion, not the force of government. I will not ask politicians to foist it on others because I think it’s good for them.

•I resolve to help others who genuinely need it by involving myself directly or by supporting those who are providing assistance through charitable institutions. I will not complain about a problem and then insist that government tinker with it at twice the cost and half the effectiveness.

•Finally, I resolve that the highest authority in which I place my strongest faith will not be the United States Congress.

Lawrence W. Reed, an economist and historian, is president of the Foundation for Economic Education.

Categories:  Disturbing Trends | Economy

Who’s Naughty? Who’s Nice?

Posted December 20th, 2010 by Julie

Check out this list of disruptive acts done by the liberal left through the years. When you put them all together, it's absolutely shocking. Glance through it and you're sure to learn a thing or two about how the left plays the game…

The Un-Hinged Left: A sampling of destructive behavior

Categories:  Disturbing Trends