“Everything You Need To Know About the Dangers of a Con Con”
Today on the Mark Davis Show at 9:30 A. M., Mark did a excellent interview with Phyllis Schlafly on her concerns over Lt. Gov. Dewhurst’s resolution in support of a Constitutional Convention (a.k.a., “Con Con”). Please go to the following link and click “Friday 1/28 — The Best of Mark Davis.” Then click either the “Listen” link or the “Download this show” link. Mike Williams is interviewed first and then Phyllis Schlafly follows.
As a long-time Constitutional attorney, Schlafly explains how dangerous it would be to open up the U. S. Constitution to the radicals who might very well gain control of such a Convention, giving them the freedom to change just about anything they want to change in our U. S. Constitution.
http://www.wbap.com/sectional.asp?id=8659
Even the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board has spoken out against a Con Con in a 1.25.11 article posted at: http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/01/25/2796594/david-dewhursts-delusional-call.html
Below are comments made by Pat Carlson, president of Texas Eagle Forum, about the Con Con.
Further on down the page are the Texas Senators and their contact information.
At the bottom of this e-mail are comments made by other concerned Texas citizens who recognize the dangers of a Con Con.
| ===================================== |
| |
| Posted on RAMPARTS 360 — 1.28.11 |
| What’s wrong with holding a Constitutional Convention?
Posted: 27 Jan 2011 04:45 AM PST
by Pat Carlson | January 27, 2011 | Texas Eagle Forum
It was announced today that Lt. Governor Dewhurst plans to bring up a resolution calling on Congress to convene a constitutional convention to pass a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. A balanced budget amendment may be a good idea, but accomplishing this with a constitutional convention is a terrible idea.
Article V of the US Constitution requires Congress to convene a constitutional convention to consider amendments if two thirds (34) of the state legislatures call for a convention. This is the venue Lt. Gov. Dewhurst is proposing. But amendments to the Constitution can also be made by the votes of two thirds of both Houses of Congress followed by the ratification of three fourths of state legislatures. This is the procedure that should be used and has been used throughout our history. Our founding fathers set up high hurdles to overcome knowing alterations could be perilous to the original document.
If a Constitutional Convention were convened, there is nothing in the Constitution and no federal laws stating who would preside, how it would be conducted, how many amendments could offered, who could participate and what the agenda would be. This would open the door for the most radical groups to come in and completely rewrite the constitution. Just imagine Nancy Pelosi presiding over a constitutional convention. What the agenda would be and who would be attending as delegates. That nightmare would be the death of our Constitution.
Phyllis Schlafly, President of the National Eagle Forum, has written extensively about this. She is a Constitutional lawyer and has been a well-respected national conservative leader since 1964.
Below are links to two of Mrs. Schlafly’s articles.
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2010/apr10/10-04-09.html
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2008/dec08/08-12-19.html
Please call or email Lt. Governor Dewhurst’s office and your state senator’s office.
Again, this is a terrible idea. We must protect our wonderful constitution.
Pat Carlson TEF, President
Phone numbers and emails are provided below.
Lt. Governor Dewhurst, 512-463-0001
www.ltgov.state.tx.us
Sen. Brian Birdwell, 512-463-0122!!
brian.birdwell@senate.state.tx.us!!
Sen. John Carona, 512-463-0116! !
john.carona@senate.state.tx.us! !
Sen. Wendy Davis, 512-463-0110! !
wendy.davis@senate.state.tx.us! !
Sen. Bob Deuell, 512-463-0102!
bob.deuell@senate.state.tx.us!
Sen. Robert Duncan, 512-463-0128!
robert.duncan@senate.state.tx.us!
Sen. Rodney Ellis, 512-463-0113! !
rodney.ellis@senate.state.tx.us! !
Sen. Kevin Eltife, 512-463-0101!
kevin.eltife@senate.state.tx.us!
Sen. Craig Estes, 512-463-0130!
craig.estes@senate.state.tx.us!
Sen. Troy Fraser, 512-463-0124!
troy.fraser@senate.state.tx.us!
Sen. Mario Gallegos, 512-463-0106!
mario.gallegos@senate.state.tx.us!
Sen. Chris Harris, 512-463-0109! !
chris.harris@senate.state.tx.us! !
Sen. Glenn Hegar, 512-463-0118! !
glenn.hegar@senate.state.tx.us! !
Sen. Juan Hinojosa, 512-463-0120!
juan.hinojosa@senate.state.tx.us!!
Sen. Joan Huffman, 512-463-0117!!
joan.huffman@senate.state.tx.us!!
Sen. Mike Jackson, 512-463-0111! !
mike.jackson@senate.state.tx.us!! |
Sen. Eddie Lucio, 512-463-0127
eddie.lucio@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Jane Nelson, 512-463-0112
jane.nelson@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Robert Nichols, 512-463-0103
robert.nichols@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Steve Ogden, 512-463-0105
steve.ogden@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Dan Patrick, 512-463-0107
dan.patrick@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Jose Rodriguez, 512-463-0129
jose.rodriguez@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Kel Seliger, 512-463-0131
kel.seliger@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Florence Shapiro, 512-463-0108
?orence.shapiro@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Carlos Uresti, 512-463-0119
carlos.uresti@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, 512-463-0126
leticia.vandeputte@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Kirk Watson, 512-463-0114
kirk.watson@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Jeff Wentworth, 512-463-0125
jeff.wentworth@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Royce West, 512-463-0123
royce.west@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. John Whitmire, 512-463-0115
john.whitmire@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Tommy Williams, 512-463-0104
tommy.williams@senate.state.tx.us
Sen. Judith Zafrini, 512-463-0121
judith.zaf?rini@senate.state.tx.us |
|
==========================
This is posted at www.realclearconservatives..com and will shortly be posted at www.texasgopvote.com
KILL THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION RESOLUTIONS IN THE LEGISLATURE
Resolutions Calling for a Constitutional Convention (ConCon) have Been Filed by Republicans in Both the House and the Senate. They must be stopped!!
§ SJR1—Ogden;
§ SJR10—Florence Shapiro;
§ SJR15—Wentworth;
§ HJR60—Pitts
§ HJR69—Kolkhorst.
The well-intended purpose for calling a ConCon is to enact a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA)
The risk of a Constitutional Convention outweighs any hoped-for good results. Once the convention convenes there is no provision in the constitution, or in law, to limit the convention to any one agenda item
A Runaway Convention Carries a Host of Unintended Consequences:
§ Repeal of the Second Amendment (the gun-grabbers would love this)
§ Repeal of the 10th Amendment (the Feds would love this)
§ Repeal of the Electoral College (in favor of a popular vote) The liberals would love this!
§ Repeal of presidential term limits (this should remain in place)
§ Recognition of International Law as a part of our Supreme Court decision-making (already being done unconstitutionally)
§ Re-write of the Fourteenth Amendment by excluding the ‘under the jurisdiction thereof’ phrase to include children born of Illegal Aliens
§ Adoption of a North American Union (open borders—proposed by George W. Bush )
These are but a few of the problems with which we would be faced.
A BBA would not control federal spending. It would merely give political cover to the big-spenders to raise taxes because the BBA would require a tax increase or exorbitant fees to balance the budget. How else to get revenues to match the uncapped spending? The newly proposed Federal BBA Amendment should be closely scrutinized to see that it guards against higher taxes and requires spending reductions and/or caps before endorsing it.
The cost of waging a campaign against bad amendments would be enormous!
Fighting the liberal media, which would be in support of liberty-destroying amendments, would be an expensive, ominous and potentially losing task!
In today’s highly contentious political climate, it makes no sense to subject the wisdom of our godly Constitutional Founders to the destruction of the safeguards against governmental oppression embodied in the Constitution.
Other Methods of Balancing the Budget
The budget could be balanced through specific legislation calling for a Balanced Budget without an amendment– or through the traditional process of a congressional Balanced Budget Amendment in Congress which would then have to be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. Before it is embraced, this newly proposed Federal Balanced Budget Amendment should be closely scrutinized to see that it guards against higher taxes and requires spending reductions
But, the Constitutional Convention process should never be considered for any reason however well-intended.
The original intent of the Constitution is sufficient to meet today’s needs if the president, members of congress and the judiciary would honor and enforce it. If they ignore what the Constitution says now, why should we expect them to enforce any new conservative amendment/s?
The aforementioned legislative Resolutions will probably be voted next week–first in the Texas Senate and then in the House. Contact your state Representative and state Senator immediately to OPPOSE all resolutions calling for a ConCon.
Urge your state Senator and Representative to read Phyllis Schlafly’s excellent expose’ of a ConCon
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2010/apr10/10-04-09html — Good advice Against a ConCon
CON CON: Playing Russian Roulette with the Constitution –Dec. 1984 Phyllis Schlafly
Immediate Action Needed!
Contact your State Senator and Representative Now.
http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/Senate/senmem.htm
http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/